Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  
          The Members       Trial Transcript       Managing Directors!       Best & Brightest       Total News Suppression  

Tainted jury? - We'll leave that up to you

In a courtroom with a federal judge, a dozen federal attorneys, a group of defendant, and spectators, a nervous juror entered the courtroom, separated from the other jurors, and had the courage to tell the Court that people were using improper influence in the jury room. The Court snapped at this literally shaking woman.

With uncommon bravado, she insisted that people were making decisions for other people. Again, the Court's voice rose, saying, "Ah! Ah! I don't want to hear it!" and sent her back into the jury room for deliberations!   One might think the lawyers would be leaping.     Not a peep from any of the attorneys present. Nearly a dozen defense lawyers, and not one of them raised their voice.

It's edifying to illuminate an undeniably eerie connection between these federally funded defenders:
Every one of the federally-paid defense lawyers continues to be widely known within their legal fraternatiy as lawyers who lose most or all of their assigned cases. It is most assuredly rare for a federal trial requiring so many defense lawyers to have such an uneven distrubution, so many demonstrably inept lawyers assigned to one set of defendants. No rich mix of mediocrity and excellence here, only a surfeit of the former.

That has led to the claim that these federally-paid defense lawyers were not intentionally tolerating such perversion of the jury process,
that in fact they did not know how to respond to a court that was tolerating so many different oddities and irregularities in the process, from voir dire right through to the end
multiple issues of jury interference and subornment, as direct as any arbiter of law or ethics could ask for.

At one point, another juror notified the Court that her Mercedes Benz had been hit and damaged in the courthouse parking lot, and that she was sure the hit and run had been committed by one of the defendants, Annette Haley, with Haley's Mercedes Benz. Never mind that Haley had numerous outside investments; none of the other defendants except the publisher of Who's Who had ever owned a Mercedes. Yet the impression on the jury was clearly significant, more so with a juror carping in every private jury session that a rich defendant's Mercedes had hit and damaged her car, AND had denied it and "Who's going to pay for it?," and.... ... and this does not bode well.

After a few days of complaints, and notes to the Court about who she should submit her money claim to, that juror was finally released, long after her damage was done.

Is it possible for employees of a complainant to sit on the jury? The use of the plural is both intended and accurate: although the U.S. Postal Service was the de jure complainant in this case, efforts to secure jury seats for postal employees succeeded, with nary a peep from the federally-paid defense attorneys.   With a sixteen-week trial, and enormous pressure from above, it is clear what their influence effected.

The jury heard days and days and more days of testimony about Bruce Gordon's egregiously lavish lifestyle and ninety-dollar socks; followed by weeks and more weeks of testimony about his financial and ethical chicanery. Talk about poisoning people with guilt by association! Not one of the defendants earned in a year what Gordon spent in a week, never spent personal time with him nor broke bread with him, yet the jury concluded that if Gordon could live this way, his employees must have been doing the same thing. Hundreds of hours of testimony focused exclusively on Gordon and his financial picture.

  When several jurors mouthed literally tearful apologives to defendants and defense counsel after the end of trial, it became clear that jurors had been demonstrably usurped of their authority and lawful obligations, ergo provably against their will. The appropriate word is 'arrogate.' This case is one for the books, indeed.  



Million-dollar con man testifying to stay out of prison

America's Best & Brightest    Main Page       Con THESE People?!!      

     More comment    Censored      Masters and Millionaires

Censored        Back to Top of Page      

 Copyright by Mister-Shortcut
All rights reserved for those who reach out to starving people

You are invited -- perfervidly urged -- to help feed those who are hungrier than you.
Here, you can give NO CHARGE TO YOU to you.
The MisterShortcut Zen Path and Tao of Healthier Living Applaud YOU For Free Clickthroughs
Meritable sponsors donate 1.1 cups of staple food for our free clicks.
Whoa.   When you click this food button and the one that pops open you save a human life... at no cost to you.

The desire to feed starving people, to eliminate global hunger...
that was the water that fed the seedling of the MisterShortcut Zen Path of Masters and Millionaires.

Learn more to earn more; learn more to live more and give more.

Please help MisterShortcut erase worldwide starvation by clicking on the food buttons.
Fair trade for a billion-dollar service for you, hm? Let us keep in mind that excellence does not occur by accident.
  Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  
  Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  

Most Scandalous Trials of the Century -Justice Screwed, Blued, and Tattooed

How rare it is to find a case that can offer not merely two or three, instead, more than a dozen major reasons for overturning that conviction.
Here is a case studied by a respected federal judge for many months, who found that no crime had been committed, and dismissed the case.

Reed Elsevier, Ltd, as the single richest and most powerful publisher in more than one hundred countries around the world,
easily. empirically and truthfully described as one of the most corrupt corporations in all of human history,
perverted the foundations of American justice in the Who's Who Worldwide case with cash, power, and perqs.

Imagine a trial where not ten percent of the proceedings have ANY connection with most of the defendants.
That alone should require a separation of trial. In this case, NOT EVEN ONE PERCENT of the proceedings,
accusations, presented evidence, or accepted facts, had anything to do with the "sales" defendants.

The Who's Who Worldwide case was all about Bruce Gordon, his machinations and his accountant,
and the many companies operated in secrecy by Gordon and Liz Sauter, his true "henchman."

For days and days and weeks and weeks, all the discussion was about Gordon and his actions.
Prosecution witness after prosecution witness exculpated the sales defendants, yet,
this same judge who had previously dismissed the case after months of study,
was under one of the worst pressures any judge can be subjected to:
pressure from the federal court of appeals above him, who, in
New York's bailiwick, remains under the control of....
Reed Elsevier, the most powerful force today
in the American arena of jurisprudence.

This can be fixed by Presidential Pardon.
Call 202-456-1414 to lift your voice.

Worst Attorney Of All Time; - The Sad Story of Who's Who Worldwide
Thomas FX Dunn demonstrates some thirty-eight discrete reasons to qualify himself
over and again as perhaps the worst defense counselor of all time

Least Credible Trials

The Sad Story of Who's Who Worldwide And Seventy-Four Thousand Leaders and Role Models.

The largest executive club ever created. More than fifty-eight thousand members at the top.
CEO's and Presidents, Chairmen of the Boards of just about every major company in the U.S.
From the founder of the American Cancer Society and others like Georgette Mosbacher,
or the Chairmen of Coke, American Express, every major bank and stock exchangers,
a Presidential physician who personaifies the American Dream being worth it all.
Tens of thousands of accomplished people, all cheated by odiferous corruption,
all defrauded of their memberships by an egriously greedy postal inspector,
forever sealing the name of Martin Beigelman as the paradigm of nadirs,
possibly the single most corrupt Postal Inspector In USPS history.
Picture giving up your pension just a couple of years short,
because the payoff from Reid Elsevier was that huge.
Nope. Didn't even stick out a last couple of years,
wanting the immediate quintupling of salary.
So many... odious facts surround this case.
Your personal assistance is solicited.
A letter, an email, or a telegram,
or throw ten bucks at someone
maybe a quick phone call.
Free MisterShortcut.
Free the Who's Who'ers.

Reed Elsevier, Ltd, and its many hundreds of subsidiaries,
is the richest, most powerful and influential publisher on earth.

From the national phone book listing every lawyer in the US (who pay),
to science journals and seventeen or more Who's Who organizations,
the huge Lexis-Nexis or however the online jurggernaut is spelled,
with hugely expressed influence. Scores of powerful publications.
Their corruption of those in government service is legendary.
their actions so abhorrent the U.S. government banned them,
literally ordered them not to open any offices in the USA.
their influence continues to become more pernicious,
more pervasive, as their acquisitions continue.
This foreign corporation buys human beings.
Please, pick up that phone and get irate..
If you like, get angry first, then call.
Ask the Prez to issue a pardon,
please add your voice today.

If you allow them to do this to the Who's Who'ers today,
it's an open invitation for them to continue on this way.
This is just one of their vicious conquests among so many,
revealed in one of the Least Credible Trials,
one of the most screwed-up trials of the century,
The Sad Story of Who's Who Worldwide.
Call Congress, call the White House.
Demand a pardon for the Who's Who-ers.
Please.     Call today.

(Reed Elsevier has been "pagewaxing" many Who's Who sites, which means illegally erasing them,
so the effort was engendered to create many hundreds of different versions, and upload them to hundreds of separate websites.
So, if you find dead links, you have a few mirror sites linked to each of the primary Who's Who Registry sites)

Who's Who Mirror Site 1       Who's Who Mirror 2       Who's Who 3       Who's Who 4       Who's Who 5       Who's Who Mirror 6     

Least Credible Trials

There are now hundreds of huge websites with the full story of the Mishegas of Who's Who Worldwide,
a necessary action because of the illicit and undeniably reprehensible actions of Reed Elsevier, Ltd.

Each "Least Credible Trials" website contains more than 12,000 printable pages,
detailing how a handful of salespeople, each with a life and story all their own,
had everything taken from them by raw, base corruption in this great land.
Reed Elsevier, Ltd, and its hundreds and hundreds of subsidiaries,
is the richest, most powerful and influential publisher on earth.

Their corruption of those in government service is legendary.
This is just one of their vicious conquests among so many,
revealed in one of the Least Credible Trials,
one of the most screwed-up trials of the century,
The Sad Story of Who's Who Worldwide.
Call Congress, call the White House.
Demand a pardon for the Who's Who-ers.
Please.     Call today.